Concealing corruption at the Massachusetts medical board involving forensic fraud:  Indefensible in the wake of Annie Dookhan and other lab scandals.

Disrupted Physician

Lord Acton warned that we should not make moral allowances for powerful people just because they are powerful. If a common man murdered someone, Acton explained, he should hang. But when a king or queen murders, we make allowances for it. “I would hang them higher than Haman, for reasons of quite obvious justice, still more, still higher, for the sake of historical science” Acton wrote.  The same dynamic applies here.

One thing is for certain.  There should be zero-tolerance for forensic fraud perpetrated by those in positions of power.   This is  worse than Annie Dookhan as her victims were abstractions.  She did not see the damage that resulted from her laboratory misconduct.

And as far as I can find, these documents are the most elaborate and complete representation of the mechanics of forensic fraud available and show the sequential steps between the requesting party and complicit lab.   The documents also show how easy laboratory misconduct is…

View original post 150 more words

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Concealing corruption at the Massachusetts medical board involving forensic fraud:  Indefensible in the wake of Annie Dookhan and other lab scandals.

  1. […] The criminal misconduct and fraud is obvious to anyone and this includes any  pre-teen who has watched a a handful of “CSI” or “Law and Order.”  Comment 3 to Rule 1.13 (Organization as Client) states that “ As defined in Rule 1.0(f), knowledge can be inferred from circumstances and “a lawyer cannot ignore the obvious.”   The falsely-created evidence and perjury are here are not just obvious but glaringly obvious and bedazzled in sequins and day-glo.  The documents are specific, precise and crystal clear. They are also copious and redundant.  No ambiguity or doubt or alternative hypothesis exist.  Therefore Bertram’s “willful ignorance” card is is a bust. His continued defense of the indefensible is rife with contradictions, flip-flops, non-sequiturs, absolute nonsense  and outright fabrications.  This has  become glaringly obvious and his candor patina is chock full of holes.  The simple and direct but inconvenient fact is that the documentary evidence shows clear and detailed evidence of flagrant fraud and inexcusable misconduct that is displayed so plainly and comprehensibly that any reasonable person including a child could recognize it.  One does not have to be an attorney to see it as the only two conditions that would prevent its recognition are being asleep or the inability to read. The truth is neither arcane nor equivocal and this renders Bertram in full violation of the Rules of Professional conduct and he has dug his heels into the ground and stuck his head in the sand for over a year.  E-mail exchanges show exactly what he was told and when and ignorance here is not bliss as his falsely feigned “I know nothing” indifference is not not simply apathetic but pathetic.  It is unbelievable and absurd.   He might as well claim that he was under the impression that the  sky was  yellow and the sun was blue. […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s